Category: Algebra
"Published in Newark, California, USA"
Resolve into partial fractions for
Solution:
In this lesson, we need to learn this one because you will use this method often when you will study or take-up Integral Calculus. If you will integrate the algebraic fractions, then you must rewrite it into partial fractions first. If you know how to combine a fraction either by addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division, then you must know how to split a fraction into partial fractions. Anyway, let's consider the given equation above
The first thing that we have to do is to factor the numerator and denominator if you can. You must simplify a fraction into lowest term always. That's a rule in Mathematics. As you notice that one of the factor in the denominator which is x2 + 3x + 3 cannot be factored, then we have to leave it as is. In this case, we have to split the above equation into partial fractions as follows
Multiply both sides of the equation by their Least Common Denominator (LCD) which is (2x + 3)(x2 + 3x + 3) as follows
Expand the right side of the equation and group according to their variables
In order to solve for the value of A, B, and C, we need to equate the both sides of the equation according to their variables.
For x2: 0 = A + 2B
A = - 2B (equation 1)
For x: 12 = 3A + 3B + 2C
12 = 3(- 2B) + 3B + 2C
12 = - 6B + 3B + 2C
12 = - 3B + 2C (equation 2)
For x0: 21 = 3A + 3C
7 = A + C
7 = - 2B + C (equation 3)
Use equation 2 and equation 3 to solve for the value of B as follows
- 3B + 2C = 12 —————> - 3B + 2C = 12
-2(- 2B + C = 7) 4B - 2C = - 14
————————
B = - 2
Substitute the value of B to equation 3, we have
- 2B + C = 7
- 2(- 2) + C = 7
4 + C = 7
C = 3
Substitute the value of B to equation 1, we have
A = - 2B
A = - 2(- 2)
A = 4
Therefore,

This website will show the principles of solving Math problems in Arithmetic, Algebra, Plane Geometry, Solid Geometry, Analytic Geometry, Trigonometry, Differential Calculus, Integral Calculus, Statistics, Differential Equations, Physics, Mechanics, Strength of Materials, and Chemical Engineering Math that we are using anywhere in everyday life. This website is also about the derivation of common formulas and equations. (Founded on September 28, 2012 in Newark, California, USA)
Friday, March 15, 2013
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Solving Radical Equations, 2
Category: Algebra
"Published in Newark, California, USA"
Find the roots of the equation for
Solution:
In solving the radical equations, you have to be very careful and write down the equations very well because the roots of the radical equations can be real, extraneous, or both. Anyway, consider the given equation above
Transpose either one of the term to the right side of the equation
Divide both sides of the equation by their common factor which is (2x - 1) as follows
Square the both sides of the equation to eliminate the radical signs
Expand the equation above and solve for the value of x as follows
Next, substitute x = 0 to the given equation, we have
Since the root is not satisfied to the given equation because both sides of the equation are not equal, then the root of the equation is extraneous. NO ANSWER for this problem.
"Published in Newark, California, USA"
Find the roots of the equation for
Solution:
In solving the radical equations, you have to be very careful and write down the equations very well because the roots of the radical equations can be real, extraneous, or both. Anyway, consider the given equation above
Transpose either one of the term to the right side of the equation
Divide both sides of the equation by their common factor which is (2x - 1) as follows
Square the both sides of the equation to eliminate the radical signs
Expand the equation above and solve for the value of x as follows
Next, substitute x = 0 to the given equation, we have
Since the root is not satisfied to the given equation because both sides of the equation are not equal, then the root of the equation is extraneous. NO ANSWER for this problem.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Simple Chemical Conversion
Category: Chemical Engineering Math, Differential Equations
"Published in Newark, California, USA"
For a substance C, the time rate of conversion is proportional to the square of the amount x of unconverted substance. Let k be the numerical value of the constant of proportionality and let the amount of unconverted substance be x0 at time t = 0. Determine x for all t ≥ 0.
Solution:
The given word problem is another good application of first order, first linear equation where a simple chemical conversion of a substance is involved. Let's analyze the given problem as follows
for C ────────────> Product
initial x0 0
at time t x0 - x x
From the word problem, "the time rate of conversion is proportional to the square of the amount x of unconverted substance", the working equation will be
The above equation is negative because the value of x is decreasing as time is increasing. Using the method of separation of variables, we have
Integrate on both sides of the equation
To solve for the value of C, substitute x = x0 and t = 0 to the above equation, we have
Therefore, the amount of x at t ≥ 0 will be
"Published in Newark, California, USA"
For a substance C, the time rate of conversion is proportional to the square of the amount x of unconverted substance. Let k be the numerical value of the constant of proportionality and let the amount of unconverted substance be x0 at time t = 0. Determine x for all t ≥ 0.
Solution:
The given word problem is another good application of first order, first linear equation where a simple chemical conversion of a substance is involved. Let's analyze the given problem as follows
for C ────────────> Product
initial x0 0
at time t x0 - x x
From the word problem, "the time rate of conversion is proportional to the square of the amount x of unconverted substance", the working equation will be
The above equation is negative because the value of x is decreasing as time is increasing. Using the method of separation of variables, we have
Integrate on both sides of the equation
To solve for the value of C, substitute x = x0 and t = 0 to the above equation, we have
Therefore, the amount of x at t ≥ 0 will be
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)